高質量的MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I考題資訊|第一次嘗試輕鬆學習並通過考試&可靠的MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I：Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect I

很多考生都是因為 Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I 考試失敗了，對任何考試都提不起任何興趣，專業從事最新 Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I 認證考題編定的 MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I 考題幫助很多考生擺脫 MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I 考試不能順利過關的挫敗心理。MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I擬真試題已經被很多考生使用，並且得到了眾多的好評。因為該考題具備了覆蓋率很高，能夠消除考生對考試的疑慮；貼心服務，讓考生安心輕鬆通過考試，責任心強，把考生通過考試當作自己的事情來對待！

Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I 考試大綱：

主題	簡介
主題 1	Monitoring and Analyzing Application Networks: It discusses Anypoint Platform components for data generation, collected metrics, and key alerts. This topic also includes specifying alerts to define Mule applications.
主題 2	Explaining Application Network Basics: This topic includes sub-topics related to identifying and differentiating between technologies for API-led connectivity, describing the role and characteristics of web APIs, assigning APIs to tiers, and understanding Anypoint Platform components.
主題 3	Meeting API Quality Goals: This topic focuses on designing resilience strategies, selecting appropriate caching and OS usage scenarios, and describing horizontal scaling benefits.
主題 4	Governing Web APIs on Anypoint Platform: This topic includes sub-topics related to managing API instances and environments, selecting API policies, enforcing API policies, securing APIs, and understanding OAuth 2.0 relationships.
主題 5	Architecting and Deploying API Implementations: It covers important aspects like using auto-discovery, identifying VPC requirements, comparing hosting options and understanding testing methods. The topic also involves automated building, testing, and deploying in a DevOps setting.
主題 6	Designing and Sharing APIs: Identifying dependencies between API components, creating and publishing reusable API assets, mapping API data models between Bounded Contexts, and recognizing idempotent HTTP methods.
主題 7	Designing APIs Using System, Process, and Experience Layers: Identifying suitable APIs for business processes, assigning them according to functional focus, and recommending data model approaches are its sub-topics.
主題 8	Establishing Organizational and Platform Foundations: Advising on a Center for Enablement (C4E) and identifying KPIs, describing MuleSoft Catalyst's structure, comparing Identity and Client Management options, and identifying data residency types are essential sub-topics.

>> MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I考題資訊 <<

MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I題庫資訊 - MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I認證資料

你肯定聽說過NewDumps的MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I考古題吧？但是，你用過嗎？我們經常會聽到“NewDumps的考古題真是好資料，多虧了它我才通過了考試”這樣的話。NewDumps從使用過考古題的人們那裏得到了很多的好評。這是因為它確實能幫助考生們節省很多時間，並保證大家順利通過考試。

最新的 Salesforce MuleSoft MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I 免費考試真題 (Q129-Q134):

問題 #129
When designing an upstream API and its implementation, the development team has been advised to NOT set timeouts when invoking a downstream API, because that downstream API has no SLA that can be relied upon. This is the only downstream API dependency of that upstream API.
Assume the downstream API runs uninterrupted without crashing. What is the impact of this advice?

A. The invocation of the downstream API will run to completion without timing out
B. A toad-dependent timeout of less than 1000 ms will be applied by the Mule runtime in which the downstream API implementation executes
C. An SLA for the upstream API CANNOT be provided
D. A default timeout of 500 ms will automatically be applied by the Mule runtime in which the upstream API implementation executes

答案：C

解題說明：
Correct Answer : An SLA for the upstream API CANNOT be provided.
*****************************************
>> First thing first, the default HTTP response timeout for HTTP connector is 10000 ms (10 seconds). NOT 500 ms.
>> Mule runtime does NOT apply any such "load-dependent" timeouts. There is no such behavior currently in Mule.
>> As there is default 10000 ms time out for HTTP connector, we CANNOT always guarantee that the invocation of the downstream API will run to completion without timing out due to its unreliable SLA times. If the response time crosses 10 seconds then the request may time out.
The main impact due to this is that a proper SLA for the upstream API CANNOT be provided.

問題 #130
Refer to the exhibit.

A RAML definition has been proposed for a new Promotions Process API, and has been published to Anypoint Exchange.
The Marketing Department, who will be an important consumer of the Promotions API, has important requirements and expectations that must be met.
What is the most effective way to use Anypoint Platform features to involve the Marketing Department in this early API design phase?
A) Ask the Marketing Department to interact with a mocking implementation of the API using the automatically generated API Console

B) Organize a design workshop with the DBAs of the Marketing Department in which the database schema of the Marketing IT systems is translated into RAML

C) Use Anypoint Studio to Implement the API as a Mule application, then deploy that API implementation to CloudHub and ask the Marketing Department to interact with it

D) Export an integration test suite from API designer and have the Marketing Department execute the tests In that suite to ensure they pass

A. Option B
B. Option D
C. Option A
D. Option C

答案：C

解題說明：
Correct Answer : Ask the Marketing Department to interact with a mocking implementation of the API using the automatically generated API Console.
*****************************************
As per MuleSoft's IT Operating Model:
>> API consumers need NOT wait until the full API implementation is ready.
>> NO technical test-suites needs to be shared with end users to interact with APIs.
>> Anypoint Platform offers a mocking capability on all the published API specifications to Anypoint Exchange which also will be rich in documentation covering all details of API functionalities and working nature.
>> No needs of arranging days of workshops with end users for feedback.
API consumers can use Anypoint Exchange features on the platform and interact with the API using its mocking feature. The feedback can be shared quickly on the same to incorporate any changes.

問題 #131
A company wants to move its Mule API implementations into production as quickly as possible. To protect access to all Mule application data and metadata, the company requires that all Mule applications be deployed to the company's customer-hosted infrastructure within the corporate firewall. What combination of runtime plane and control plane options meets these project lifecycle goals?

A. MuleSoft-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane
B. Manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and MuleSoft-hosted control plane
C. Manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane
D. iPaaS provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and MuleSoft-hosted control plane

答案：C

解題說明：
Correct Answer : Manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane
*****************************************
There are two key factors that are to be taken into consideration from the scenario given in the question.
>> Company requires both data and metadata to be resided within the corporate firewall
>> Company would like to go with customer-hosted infrastructure.
Any deployment model that is to deal with the cloud directly or indirectly (Mulesoft-hosted or Customer's own cloud like Azure, AWS) will have to share atleast the metadata.
Application data can be controlled inside firewall by having Mule Runtimes on customer hosted runtime plane. But if we go with Mulsoft-hosted/ Cloud-based control plane, the control plane required atleast some minimum level of metadata to be sent outside the corporate firewall.
As the customer requirement is pretty clear about the data and metadata both to be within the corporate firewall, even though customer wants to move to production as quickly as possible, unfortunately due to the nature of their security requirements, they have no other option but to go with manually provisioned customer-hosted runtime plane and customer-hosted control plane.

問題 #132
A company has started to create an application network and is now planning to implement a Center for Enablement (C4E) organizational model. What key factor would lead the company to decide upon a federated rather than a centralized C4E?

A. When there are a large number of existing common assets shared by development teams
B. When the majority of the applications in the application network are cloud based
C. When development is already organized into several independent initiatives or groups
D. When various teams responsible for creating APIs are new to integration and hence need extensive training

答案：C

解題說明：
Correct Answer : When development is already organized into several independent initiatives or groups
*****************************************
>> It would require lot of process effort in an organization to have a single C4E team coordinating with multiple already organized development teams which are into several independent initiatives. A single C4E works well with different teams having at least a common initiative. So, in this scenario, federated C4E works well instead of centralized C4E.

問題 #133
A large organization with an experienced central IT department is getting started using MuleSoft. There is a project to connect a siloed back-end system to a new Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system. The Center for Enablement is coaching them to use API-led connectivity.
What action would support the creation of an application network using API-led connectivity?

A. Create a System API to unlock the data on the back-end system using a REST API
B. Invite the business analyst to create a business process model to specify the canonical data model between the two systems
C. To expedite this project, central IT should extend the CRM system and back-end systems to connect to one another using built in integration interfaces
D. Determine if the new CRM system supports the creation of custom: REST APIs, establishes 4 private network with CloudHub, and supports GAuth 2.0 authentication

答案：A

解題說明：
For an organization starting with API-led connectivity to integrate a siloed back-end system with a new CRM, the following approach aligns with best practices and MuleSoft's Center for Enablement (C4E) guidance:
API-led Connectivity: This model organizes APIs into distinct layers (System, Process, and Experience) to improve reusability, modularity, and manageability.
System APIs are used to expose and unlock data from core systems (such as back-end applications or databases).
Process APIs orchestrate data across multiple systems and transform it as needed.
Experience APIs format the data specifically for consumption by applications or devices, such as the CRM in this case.
Step to Support Application Network:
Create a System API for the back-end system. This API should expose the necessary data to support integration with the CRM.
By creating a System API with a RESTful interface, data can be accessed in a standardized way, making it easier to integrate with other systems and supporting future scalability.
Why Option D is Correct:
Creating a System API aligns with the principle of API-led connectivity, ensuring that data is exposed in a reusable manner. This API can then be orchestrated by Process APIs as needed to meet CRM requirements and can easily be extended to other applications.
of Incorrect Options:
Option A (creating a business process model) does not directly enable connectivity or expose back-end data through APIs.
Option B is unnecessary at this stage; assessing CRM capabilities like OAuth 2.0 support is not directly related to creating the application network via System APIs.
Option C contradicts API-led best practices by suggesting a point-to-point integration, which API-led connectivity seeks to avoid due to its lack of flexibility and scalability.
Reference
Refer to MuleSoft's API-led Connectivity resources for a detailed framework on building scalable integration layers using System, Process, and Experience APIs.

問題 #134
......

有很多網站提供資訊Salesforce的MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I考試，為你提供 Salesforce的MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I考試認證和其他的培訓資料，NewDumps是唯一的網站，為你提供優質的Salesforce的MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I考試認證資料，在NewDumps指導和幫助下，你完全可以通過你的第一次Salesforce的MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I考試，我們NewDumps提供的試題及答案是由現代和充滿活力的資訊技術專家利用他們的豐富的知識和不斷積累的經驗，為你的未來在IT行業更上一層樓。

MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I題庫資訊: https://www.newdumpspdf.com/MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I-exam-new-dumps.html

Nick Smith Nick Smith

Biography

高質量的MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I考題資訊|第一次嘗試輕鬆學習並通過考試&可靠的MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I：Salesforce Certified MuleSoft Platform Architect I

Salesforce MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I 考試大綱：

MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I題庫資訊 - MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I認證資料

最新的 Salesforce MuleSoft MuleSoft-Platform-Architect-I 免費考試真題 (Q129-Q134):

About DATPROF

Contact